Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959052›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Neonatal hearing screening among high-risk newborns in Northwestern Nigeria.

Semen Stephen Yikawe, Nasir Aliyu, Joseph Hassan Solomon, Shuaibu Lawal, Musbau Adeyemi, Agatha Eileen Wapmuk, Andrew Musa Adamu, Anayochukwu Edward Anyasodor, Oyelola A Adegboye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Universal newborn hearing screening in Southwest Iran: coverage, risk factors, and outcomes in a large-scale population.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Semen Stephen YikaweNigerian Air Force Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria.
Nasir AliyuFederal Teaching Hospital, Katsina, Katsina, Nigeria.
Joseph Hassan SolomonNigerian Airforce Hospital, Abuja, Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria.
Shuaibu LawalFederal Teaching Hospital, Katsina, Katsina, Nigeria.
Musbau AdeyemiFederal Teaching Hospital, Katsina, Katsina, Nigeria.
Agatha Eileen WapmukNigerian Institute for Medical Research, Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.
Andrew Musa AdamuAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Anayochukwu Edward AnyasodorRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia.
Oyelola A AdegboyeMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) patients are at an increased risk of developing hearing loss. Given the critical role of normal hearing in speech and language development, early detection and treatment of this condition in children are paramount. Methods: Hearing assessments were performed using transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and automated auditory brain stem response (AABR) tests on 60 neonates. The resulting data were analysed using R version 4.3.3. Results: Out of the 60 neonates enrolled in the study, 57% were males and 43% were females, and their ages ranged from 1 to 30 days. A total of 43 (71.7%) neonates passed both hearing tests, while 17 (28.3%) failed. In the unadjusted analysis, low birth weight, prematurity, birth asphyxia, and gestational age were significantly associated with neonatal hearing screening failure. Premature neonates and those with low birth weight had markedly higher odds of failing the screening (Odds Ratio (OR) = 24.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) [5.85-135.0] and OR = 12.3; 95% CI [3.5-50.6], respectively), while gestational age was associated with lower odds of failure (OR = 0.59; 95% CI [0.43-0.76]). In the multivariable model, after accounting for multicollinearity, only gestational age remained a statistically significant predictor, with each additional week associated with reduced odds of screening failure (adjusted OR = 0.60; 95% CI [0.43-0.80]). Conclusion: Our findings underscore the importance of early screening for hearing loss in high-risk neonates in the NICU to facilitate timely interventions.

Indexed as

Hearing LossHearing TestsNeonatal ScreeningEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleNigeriaOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousRisk FactorsAuditory brainstem responseHearing lossNeonatal intensive care unitNeonatesNigeriaOtoacoustic emission

Identifiers

PMID40959052
PMCPMC12435327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.