ArticleJSES international2025
Augmented reality significantly reduces the absolute error between achieved and planned inclination and version of the glenoid baseplate for reversed shoulder arthroplasty.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of extended reality in shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of training efficiency and glenoid guidewire accuracy.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Mixed reality with real-time navigation grants low deviations from planned inclination and version of the glenoid for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2026Article
- Clinical accuracy of humeral and glenoid component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty using ASTRA patient-specific guides.JSES international · 2025Article
- Application of Augmented Reality in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To determine whether using augmented reality with a head-mounted display (AR-HMD) would reduce deviations between planned and achieved reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) glenoid baseplate inclination and version. Methods: Ten fresh frozen shoulders from 5 human cadavers, which were free from fractures or other bony pathologies were used. Computed tomography scans were acquired for each shoulder, and imported into image 3-dimensional processing software to plan rTSA, and notably to define the target inclination and version of the glenoid baseplate. Two experienced surgeons placed a 1.6-mm Kirschner wire on the glenoid baseplate insertion site in each shoulder (5 per surgeon) using conventional instruments, and the AR-HMD was used to measure the inclination, version, in addition to the number of outliers. Afterward, using the AR-HMD (Pixee Medical, Besançon, France) the surgeons drilled and inserted the Kirschner wire for the glenoid baseplate positioning, and computed tomography was used to measure the inclination, version, and number of outliers. Results: Absolute deviations between planned and achieved inclination were significantly smaller when using AR-HMD (0.9° ± 1.6°, range 0°-5°) than without AR-HMD (5.1°± 3.7°, range 0°-10°) ( Conclusion: AR-HMD significantly reduces the absolute error between achieved and planned inclination and version of the glenoid baseplate during rTSA, though further studies are required to confirm the benefits of this technology in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.