ArticleJSES international2025
Changes in mental health and joint-specific patient-reported outcome measures following arthroscopic shoulder labral repair.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose was to identify the effects of mental health on postoperative outcomes following arthroscopic labral repair. It was hypothesized that low preoperative mental health, measured by the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS), would demonstrate inferior patient-reported outcome measures preoperatively and postoperatively, but that improvement would be similar. Methods: Fifty subjects undergoing a primary arthroscopic anterior labral repair were included. Subjects completed the VR-12 MCS, Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) at 4 timepoints. Subjects with a VR-12 MCS score below 42.9 were classified to a low MCS cohort and those with a VR-12 MCS score above 42.9 were cataloged to a high MCS group. Patient-reported outcome measures were compared between the 2 groups. Results: At mean follow-up of 18.7 months, ASES ( Conclusion: Patients in the low VR-12 MCS group had lower postoperative outcomes but demonstrated similar preoperative to postoperative improvements in ASES, SANE, and VAS to those in the high group. VR-12 MCS significantly improved for the low MCS group suggesting that low preoperative mental health scores should not be considered a contraindication for surgery and mental health scores are modifiable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.