ArticleJSES international2025
Magnetic resonance evaluation of rotator cuff healing after surgical repair of large and massive lesions using the load-sharing rip-stop construct: encouraging results.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Musculoskeletal Digital Therapeutics and Digital Health Rehabilitation: A Global Paradigm Shift in Orthopedic Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tendon healing rate in large and massive tears using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on the Sugaya classification and to present the functional outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California, Los Angeles, and visual analog scale scores) in patients who underwent the Load-Sharing Rip-Stop (LSRS) suture technique. These patients often present with retracted lesions, limited mobility, poor-quality tissues prone to tearing, medial tears, and/or insufficient bone quality (osteopenia or osteoporosis). Methods: Retrospective evaluation of patients aged > 55 years who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair due to retracted tears (that after appropriate releases, it was not possible to cover more than 50% of the tendon footprint on the greater tuberosity upon rotator cuff traction), operated between 2014 and 2022, using the LSRS technique, and who underwent a minimum follow-up of 1 year, including postoperative MRI assessment. Results: Eighteen shoulders were included in the study and all of them performed a postoperative MRI; 1 patient experienced tendon rerupture on follow-up MRI, corresponding to a 5.56% failure rate. In the functional analysis, 16 shoulders (88.89%) scored above 80 on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and had satisfactory results on the University of California, Los Angeles score (rated as excellent and good). Conclusion: In an average follow-up of 28 months, the LSRS suture technique demonstrated satisfactory functional outcomes and a good healing rate in patients with retracted and low-mobility rotator cuff injuries. These findings reinforce the idea that the LSRS technique can be a valuable option in managing these challenging cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.