ArticleJSES international2025
Tendon stump change as a risk factor for structural failure of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk factors for postoperative retears in patients with small to medium tears following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.JSES international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to identify risk factors for retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) using the suture bridge method and to assess the relation between preoperative and postoperative tendon condition and retear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent ARCR for a medium tear. Potential risk factors, including tear width, anteroposterior and medial-lateral tear width, atrophy, fatty degeneration, and condition of the tendon stump (Ishitani's classification and rotator cuff/deltoid muscle [C/D] ratio), were identified on magnetic resonance preoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed regularly after surgery, and the C/D ratio in the sutured cuff was evaluated. Shoulders that were Sugaya type I-III were classified as the repair group and those that were type IV or V as the retear group. Risk factors for retear were analyzed by univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: We analyzed 175 patients in 183 shoulders. The overall retear rate was 13.1%. Multivariable analysis revealed medial-lateral width (odds ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.95; Conclusions: The C/D ratio and tear width were risk factors for retear after ARCR using the suture bridge method. The C/D ratio was higher in retear cases both preoperatively and postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.