Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40958995›Full record

ArticleJSES international2025

Factors influencing online patient-reported ratings among shoulder surgeons.

Krishna N Chopra, Sameer R Khawaja, Anna L Gorsky, Nicole L Greene, Frank L Vazquez, Joanne Y Zhou, Zaamin B Hussain, Michael B Gottschalk, Eric R Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Social Media and Wellness: Evolving Trends in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Representation.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Krishna N ChopraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sameer R KhawajaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anna L GorskyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nicole L GreeneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Frank L VazquezDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joanne Y ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Zaamin B HussainDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Michael B GottschalkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Eric R WagnerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported ratings serve as a model of satisfaction and can play a major role in patient recruitment. Many variables can influence ratings on physician review websites (PRWs), such as social media use, academic productivity, fellowship type, and practice setting. This study examines such factors and their relationship with average ratings and overall patient engagement on PRWs. Methods: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons directory was queried for all active members who completed either a shoulder and elbow or sports medicine fellowship in the United States. Each name was searched online for professional accounts, and the number of followers was recorded for each. A summated social media presence score was calculated to identify the top 15% of social media users in each cohort. The presence of a practice group or personal website was also recorded, as was a surgeon's practice setting (academic vs. private) and region of practice. H-index was searched on Scopus. Average ratings, number of reviews, and number of comments were collected from Healthgrades, Google Reviews, and Vitals. Results: A total of 231 shoulder surgeons were included in this review. Compared to shoulder surgeons in academic practice, those in private practice had higher mean ratings and patient engagement on PRWs. When comparing fellowships, shoulder and elbow fellowship-trained surgeons had a greater mean number of ratings on Google than those who completed a sports medicine fellowship. The top 15% of social media users had higher average patient ratings and engagement on Healthgrades compared to the rest of the cohort. There was a positive association between h-index and average rating on Google. No significant associations were found between patient satisfaction and the prestige of medical school or residency program. Discussion: Several variables can influence patient satisfaction by way of average ratings and engagement on PRWs. Prospective patients are much more likely to select surgeons with higher ratings; thus, shoulder surgeons can use this information to capitalize on opportunities to improve patient retention, recruitment, and overall patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Academic productivityFellowshipOnline engagementPatient ratingsPhysician review websitesShoulder and elbowSocial mediaSports medicine

Identifiers

PMID40958995
PMCPMC12434941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.