ArticleRadiologia brasileira
First-trimester screening for fetal growth restriction and adverse maternal/perinatal outcomes.
Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association between first-trimester screening for fetal growth restriction (FGR) and the effect of aspirin use as prophylaxis for this condition, as well as its effect on adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. A secondary objective was to evaluate the association between a high risk of FGR and adverse perinatal outcomes. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women who did or did not undergo first-trimester screening for FGR. Screening for FGR involved the evaluation of maternal characteristics, mean arterial pressure, and the results of uterine artery Doppler. Pregnancies with an estimated risk ≥ 1:155 were categorized as high risk, whereas those with an estimated risk < 1:155 were categorized as low risk. Results: We evaluated 499 pregnant women who did not undergo first-trimester screening for FGR (unscreened group) and 615 who did (screened group). The risk of gestational hypertension was lower in the screened group, as evidenced by an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.14-0.39; Conclusion: First-trimester screening for FGR seems to be associated with a higher risk of preterm birth (at < 32 and < 37 weeks). Pregnancies that are at high risk of FGR appear to also be at a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Aspirin use seems to be associated with a greater prevalence of developing gestational hypertension and of a birth weight < 2,500 g.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.