Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40958884›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

Revisiting Uric Acid Stone Dissolution Kinetics: Insights for Optimizing Medical Therapy.

Paz Lotan, Michael Mastai, Yitzhak Mastai, Sapir Shekef Aloni, Itay Sagy, Bezalel Sivan, Abd E Darawsha, David Lifshitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paz LotanDepartment of Urology, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Michael MastaiAdelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Yitzhak MastaiDepartment of Chemistry and Institute of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials (BINA), Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sapir Shekef AloniDepartment of Chemistry and Institute of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials (BINA), Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Itay SagyDepartment of Urology, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.
Bezalel SivanDepartment of Urology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Abd E DarawshaDepartment of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
David LifshitzDepartment of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Urine alkalinization, the mainstay of uric acid (UA) stone dissolution medical therapy, relies on old in vitro studies and expert opinions. Moreover, the effects of lowering urine UA concentration in patients without hyperuricosuria have rarely been investigated. We revisited the UA dissolution kinetics to determine the optimal alkalinization target and evaluate the effect of reducing urine UA saturation below normal levels. Methods: Ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry was employed to analyze the dissolution kinetics of intact and grounded stones in artificial urine solution at various pH levels and UA concentrations. Crystal structures of precipitates were examined by X-ray diffraction. Key findings and limitations: The average dissolution rate increased fourfold when the pH rose from 6-6.5 to 6.5-7 and ninefold when it reached 7-7.2, with the optimal level being at 7.2. At pH 7.4, the rate dropped significantly, and hydroxyapatite crystals precipitated. Grounded stones dissolved 10-fold faster than intact stones at each pH level. Lowering of the urine UA concentration enhanced the dissolution rate only at pH >6.5 and after reducing the concentrations by 55% of the normal level. The artificial urine, buffering solution, and model could only partially mimic the in vivo urine environment. Conclusions and clinical implications: The in vitro study of UA dissolution kinetics offers valuable insights for improving medical therapy in patients with UA nephrolithiasis. Our study confirms alkalinization as the key factor for dissolution and supports expert recommendations. Specifically, by maintaining urine pH >6.5, preferably 7-7.2, and increasing stone surface area, dissolution can be optimized. Reduction of UA concentrations in patients without hyperuricosuria enhances dissolution only after sufficient alkalinization. Patient summary: In this report, we used contemporary laboratory methods to refine the optimal pH target of urine alkalinization, the mainstay medical therapy for uric acid stone dissolution. We found the dissolution rate to increase mainly at pH levels above 6.5, with the optimal pH being 7.2. Additionally, increasing the stone surface area by fragmentation increased the dissolution further, implicating a potential second-line option when initial treatment is unsuccessful. Finally, we confirmed the expert-based recommendation on the lack of effectiveness of allopurinol treatment without adequate alkalinization in patients who have normal uric acid urinary excretion.

Indexed as

ChemolysisKineticsMedical therapyNephrolithiasisStone dissolutionUric acid

Identifiers

PMID40958884
PMCPMC12435001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.