ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Application of machine learning for prognostic modeling in unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer have poor outcomes despite chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Traditional prognostic tools lack accuracy in predicting survival. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model to improve survival prediction. Methods: We retrospectively included 214 patients treated with CRT between 2018 and 2024. Five models-Cox, LASSO, RSF, SVM, and XGBoost-were trained to predict overall survival. Model performance was evaluated using the C-index, time-dependent ROC, calibration, and decision curve analysis. SHAP was used to interpret feature importance. Results: The median overall survival (mOS) for the entire cohort was 18.4 months (95% CI, 16.3-28.1). XGBoost showed the best performance (C-index = 0.949). It also achieved higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curves at 6 and 12 months (0.751 and 0.732) compared to other models. Calibration and clinical benefit were superior. SHAP analysis identified CA199, tumor size, platelet count, and age as the most important predictors. The model stratified patients into risk groups with significant survival differences (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The XGBoost-based model accurately predicted survival in unresectable pancreatic cancer patients receiving CRT. It may serve as a useful tool for personalized risk assessment and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.