ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2025
PLATE USING CANCELLOUS GRAFT VERSUS SCREW USING CANCELLOUS CORTICAL GRAFT IN THE TREATMENT OF SCAPHOID PSEUDARTHROSIS.
Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To make a comparative analysis of patients with scaphoid pseudarthrosis operated with screw and corticocancellous graft and patients operated with plate and cancellous graft only, in regards to consolidation, carpal stability and limb functionality. Methods: non-randomized retrospective cohort study. Nineteen patients with scaphoid pseudarthrosis without advanced collapse were included in the study, of which 9 patients operated with screw and corticocancellous graft (Group A) and 10 operated with plate using cancellous graft (Group B). The following were evaluated preoperatively and 12 weeks postoperatively: functional recovery using the visual analogue scale, range of motion, grip strength, digital pinch strength, DASH and MAYO wrist score functional scales. To assess carpal instability, the scapholunate and radiolunate angles were assessed on radiographs and the interscaphoid angle on CT. And the bone consolidation rate was assessed with CT in the 8th postoperative week. Results: group A with 90% and B with 100% consolidation rate, however the latter with a longer average time for consolidation - 9.7 weeks (p = 0.002). Improvement in pain intensity was achieved in both groups (p = 0.03). Increased pinch strength (p=0.04) and grip strength in group B and decreased in group A. The range of motion was superior in group B, with loss of ulnar deviation (p=0.02) and radial deviation (p=0.007) in group A. Regarding the MAYO wrist score, there was loss of function in group A and an increase in group B (p=0.007). There was correction of the scapholunate angle in both groups (p=0.03), with no difference between them. Conclusions: Patients in group B had better recovery of range of motion, pinch and grip strength, and better functionality according to the MAYO wrist score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.