Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40958816›Full record

ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2025

RADIOGRAPHIC AND FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION OF HIGH POROUS METAL OSSEOINTEGRATION IN ACETABULAR REVISIONS WITH PELVIC DISSOCIATION.

Reuder Pereira Prado, Lauro Barbosa, Gabriel Rodrigues Silva, Leandro Alves de Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Reuder Pereira PradoClinica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (COT), Goiania, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5659-8342
Lauro BarbosaClinica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (COT), Goiania, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8002-1254
Gabriel Rodrigues SilvaClinica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (COT), Goiania, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4398-8659
Leandro Alves de OliveiraClinica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (COT), Goiania, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2231-8947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic dissociation is a complex condition with a high rate of surgical complications and no established standard treatment. Surgery aims to preserve limb function by restoring bone structure and hip biomechanics. Conventional orthopaedic implants are made from materials such as stainless steel, cobalt-chrome or titanium. High-porosity implants have been introduced to improve the durability of hip arthroplasty. Objective: To evaluate osseointegration after revision total hip arthroplasty in cases of pelvic dissociation. Method: A descriptive observational study carried out at the Hospital das Clínicas of the Federal University of Goiás and at the Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic (COT) in Goiânia. Data was collected from the medical records of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty between 2012 and 2020, using titanium or tantalum implants, both high-porosity materials. Results: The study included 26 patients, 53.8% female and 46.2% male. The majority (34.6%) were aged between 60 and 69. Of the patients, 53.8% used titanium implants and 46.2% tantalum. After surgery, 38.5% had a Harris Hip Score between 70 and 80, with 61.5% of patients showing osseointegration in less than six months. Conclusion: Tantalum, due to its high porosity, was effective in treating patients with pelvic dissociation undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.

Indexed as

AcetabulumArthroplasty, Replacement, HipOsseointegrationRadiographyTantalum

Identifiers

PMID40958816
PMCPMC12435865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.