ArticleMacromolecular bioscience2025
Cell Behavior and Complex Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Cell-Laden Alginate-Gelatin Macroporous Mesostructures.
Article in Macromolecular bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioprinting Organs-Science or Fiction?-A Review From Students to Students.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Quantitative Assessment of Hydrogel Printability in Extrusion Bioprinting.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cell Behavior and Complex Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Cell-Laden Alginate-Gelatin Macroporous Mesostructures.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Periodontal Regenerative Medicine: A Focus on the Role of Mechanical Stimulation.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioprinting involves additive manufacturing of materials containing living cells, known as bioinks, which are formulated from cytocompatible hydrogel precursors. The bioink's characteristics before, during, and after crosslinking are critical for its printability, structural resolution, shape fidelity, and cell viability. The mechanical properties of printed constructs can be strongly influenced by their macroporous mesostructure, including pore size, filament diameter, and layer height, and are crucial for the intended applications in tissue engineering or regenerative medicine. It is known that the mechanical properties of hydrogels influence cell performance, but in turn, cells can also alter the mechanical properties of bioprinted constructs, which remain poorly understood. To explore these interdependencies, we selected an alginate-gelatin hydrogel (ALG-GEL), due to its well-known biocompatibility, combined with U87 cells and bioprinted three different multilayer macroporous mesostructures with varying porosity and filament diameter. We investigate how different macroporous mesostructures affect cells, how cells, in turn, influence mechanical properties, and whether the stability and mechanical properties of bioprinted macroporous mesostructures change over time. Our findings show that the bioprinted constructs are stable over the course of 14 days and highlight that cells can significantly influence their mechanical properties. This has important implications for biofabrication and tissue engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.