ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Transtracheal Wash Fluid Collection and Analysis in Healthy Goats.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transtracheal Wash Fluid Collection and Analysis in Healthy Goats.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTranstracheal wash (TTW) is frequently used to characterize respiratory disease in companion animals, cattle, and horses, but no description of TTW methods or fluid analysis in healthy goats is available. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesDescribe a technique for collecting TTW fluid (TTWF) from healthy goats and describe the nucleated cell populations within and bacterial populations isolated from TTWF in healthy goats. ANIMALS: Thirty-three healthy university-owned Boer does.
methodsProspective descriptive study. Percutaneous TTW was performed in sedated healthy goats. Retrieved TTWF from each goat was analyzed for cytologic findings, and aerobic and anaerobic microbiologic cultures were performed.
resultsAliquot recovery volume averaged 10.8%. Four doses were excluded from summary statistics for TTWF cytology and culture. In 29 TTWF samples, macrophages were the predominant cell population (40%-92%) followed by small lymphocytes (3%-39%) and neutrophils (2%-32%). Cultures of most samples yielded mixed bacterial growth (62.1%, 18/29). Bibersteinia trehalosi was the most frequently identified bacterial species from pure culture (17.2%, 5/29). No association was found between the cytologic presence of bacteria and bacterial culture results (p = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The described TTW method is a minimally invasive diagnostic procedure in goats that can be performed in a hospital or field setting with commercially available materials. Our results describe the cytologic and bacterial populations identified within TTWF of healthy goats. Cytology results do not predict bacterial growth in healthy goats. Bacterial genera that are routinely associated with bronchopneumonia in goats also are present in health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.