Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40958624›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Optimal minimal stent area after crossover stenting in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

Ju Hyeon Kim, Do-Yoon Kang, Jung-Min Ahn, Jihoon Kweon, Jihye Chae, Seong-Bong Wee, Soo Yeon An, Hansu Park, Soo-Jin Kang, Duk-Woo Park and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Evolving cutoff values for optimising left main stenting with intravascular imaging.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ju Hyeon KimDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Do-Yoon KangDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Min AhnDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jihoon KweonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jihye ChaeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Bong WeeDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo Yeon AnDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hansu ParkDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo-Jin KangDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Duk-Woo ParkDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Jung ParkDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracoronary imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has demonstrated clinical benefit over angiography-guided PCI for left main coronary artery (LM) disease. However, the optimal minimal stent area (MSA) thresholds to predict cardiovascular outcomes remain incompletely defined.

aimsThis study aimed to evaluate intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-measured segmental MSA after LM crossover stenting.

methodsWe identified 829 consecutive patients who underwent IVUS-guided PCI for unprotected LM disease using a single-stent crossover technique. The final MSA was measured at the proximal LM, distal LM, and left anterior descending artery (LAD) ostium. The primary outcome was 5-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation.

resultsThe MSA cutoff values best predicting 5-year MACE were 11.4 mm² for the proximal LM (area under the curve [AUC] 0.62), 8.4 mm² for the distal LM (AUC 0.58), and 8.1 mm² for the LAD ostium (AUC 0.57). Based on these cutoff values, stent underexpansion in the proximal LM was significantly associated with increased risk of 5-year MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.34; p<0.001). Additionally, patients with simultaneous stent underexpansion in both the distal LM and LAD ostium exhibited a significantly higher risk of 5-year MACE compared with those having adequate expansion or only single-site underexpansion (adjusted HR 2.57; p<0.001).

conclusionsAchieving sufficient stent expansion in the proximal LM and preventing underexpansion in both the distal LM and LAD ostium are critical for improving long-term clinical outcomes. The identified MSA thresholds may serve as practical benchmarks for stent optimisation during LM PCI.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionStentsUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40958624
PMCPMC12418107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.