Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40958606›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Goal Setting in Speech-Language Pathology: A Pilot Test of a 'One-Size-Fits-All' Planning Framework.

Justine Leigh Hamilton, Erin Paige Hopkins, Cassandra Marie Kerr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justine Leigh HamiltonSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3076-7806
Erin Paige HopkinsSt. Mary's General Hospital, Kitchener, Canada.
Cassandra Marie KerrSt. Mary's General Hospital, Kitchener, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeveloping treatment goals and hierarchies is fundamental to effective intervention. Despite this, interventions are often vaguely or ambiguously described, negatively impacting outcome measurement, client engagement, and team communication. THIMS (Target, Hierarchy, Ingredients, Measures, Success Criterion) is a novel intervention planning framework that aims to improve the specificity and measurability of treatment goals and hierarchies in speech-language pathology (SLP).

aimThe objective of this pilot study was to determine if clinician training in the use of the THIMS Framework was feasible and effective at improving the specificity and measurability of SLP treatment goals and hierarchies.

methodsWe completed a within-group pre-post pilot study to determine the impact of training speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to use the THIMS Framework. We evaluated participant recruitment, task completion, and attrition, as well as the specificity and measurability of SLP goals and hierarchies submitted before and after training.

resultsTwenty-three SLPs completed the study, with participants representing a broad range of years of experience and clinical practice areas. Results showed feasible recruitment and retention and significantly higher scores for treatment goals and hierarchies after completing THIMS training sessions.

conclusionTraining in the use of the THIMS Framework was feasible for a small sample size and resulted in increased specificity and measurability of SLP treatment goals and hierarchies. This 'one-size-fits-all' framework has the potential to fill the current gap for a systematic but flexible goal and hierarchy writing system for SLPs. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject For many years, the importance of specificity in goal writing and intervention planning has been highlighted as critical for ensuring client engagement, objective outcome measurement, and effective team communication. Despite this, studies continue to reveal a disconnect between clinicians acknowledging the importance of precision in goal formulation and actually applying the required level of specificity in their own treatment plans. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This pilot study describes the evaluation of a novel intervention planning framework that was designed to ensure specificity and measurability of goals and treatment hierarchies. The framework draws on elements of SMART goals and the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System to provide clinicians with a stepwise process to plan interventions for a wide range of goal areas and populations. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? To our knowledge, THIMS (now TACSI) is the only framework that provides explicit guidance on how to write specific and measurable SLP treatment goals and hierarchies that apply to any client population in any practice setting. The present study provides initial evidence that this framework has the potential to become a 'one-size-fits-all' SLP intervention planning system.

Indexed as

GoalsPatient Care PlanningSpeech-Language PathologyAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot Projectsgoaloutcome measurerehabilitationspeech–language pathology

Identifiers

PMID40958606
PMCPMC12441661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.