Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40958472›Full record

ArticlePediatric emergency care2026

Pediatric Ocular Trauma: Not Just a Pediatric Trauma Center Problem.

Zoe Flyer, John Schomberg, Andreina Giron, Peter Dinh, Donny Suh, Yigit S Guner, David Shatz, David Gibbs, Laura F Goodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric emergency care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zoe FlyerDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange.
John SchombergCHOC Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange.
Andreina GironDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange.
Peter DinhDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange.
Donny SuhDepartments of Ophthalmology.
Yigit S GunerDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange.
David ShatzDepartment of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA.
David GibbsDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange.
Laura F GoodmanDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric ocular trauma is the leading cause of monocular blindness and comprises 7% of injuries. Prompt treatment is mandatory but may vary by facility type. This study investigates factors influencing treating facility, comparing level 1 and level 2 verified pediatric trauma centers (PTC) with other trauma centers (non-PTC).

methodsThe National Trauma Data Bank 2019 was examined for ages 1 to 18 years with ICD10 ocular trauma diagnoses. Descriptive statistics compared patients of PTCs versus non-PTCs. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between treatment at PTC and type of ocular injury, adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, sex, socioeconomic status, injury severity score (ISS), and suspicion of child abuse. A second logistic regression model evaluated the association between direct transfer from emergency department (ED) to operating room (OR) and injury type, and adjusted for confounders. End points included surgical intervention and discharge disposition.

resultsOf 645 patients with ocular trauma, 67.6% were male, 14% were Hispanic. Median age was 10 years at PTC versus 13 years non-PTC ( P =0.001). Two hundred eighty-two (44%) were treated in PTC. There was no difference in proportion with ISS >15 or mechanism of ocular injury. One hundred forty-six patients were taken directly to OR from ED, with no difference between PTC and non-PTC. The most common diagnoses for patients taken directly to OR were eye or adnexa contusion and laceration, globe or adnexal open wound, and orbital wall fractures. There was no association between type of injury and treatment at PTC versus non-PTC. 71 abuse reports were noted, of which 23 (32.4%) were treated in PTCs, compared with 48 (67.6%) treated at non-PTCs ( P =0.036). Logistic regression examination of direct to OR admission revealed only Hispanic ethnicity was significantly associated ( P =0.03).

conclusionsPediatric ocular traumas are treated at both PTCs and non-PTCs at a similar rate and level of severity. Younger children and more Hispanic children tended to be treated at PTCs. More abuse reports were noted in non-PTCs. Hispanic ethnicity was noted to be inversely associated with direct transfer to OR from ED. This study should form the background from which evaluation of outcomes can begin, to clarify the optimal treatment pathways for pediatric ocular trauma, and if there are disparities in outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Indexed as

Eye InjuriesTrauma CentersAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInfantInjury Severity ScoreMalePatient TransferRetrospective StudiesUnited Statesocular traumapediatric injurypediatric trauma

Identifiers

PMID40958472
PMCPMC12736390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.