Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40958388›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2025

Chance of pouch surgery after colectomy for ulcerative colitis based on pelvic pouch volumes at the colectomy hospital, a Swedish national cohort study.

Anton Risto, Pär Myrelid, Jonas Söderling, Ola Olén, Caroline Nordenvall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Chance of pouch surgery after colectomy for ulcerative colitis based on pelvic pouch volumes at the colectomy hospital, a Swedish national cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anton RistoDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5687-0473
Pär MyrelidDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7518-9213
Jonas SöderlingClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ola OlénClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Caroline NordenvallDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Mag-TarmFonden, Swedish Gastroenterology Societyscur
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are three reconstructive options after colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC), ileal pouch anal anastomosis, ileorectal anastomosis and continent ileostomy. Less than 50% of UC patients in Sweden get bowel continuity after colectomy. The aim was to investigate the correlation between reconstructive volumes of the hospital performing the colectomy and the likelihood of reconstruction.

methodsFrom the Swedish National Patient Register, all ulcerative colitis patients subjected to colectomy between 1997 and 2020 were identified, and patient demographics, surgeries and hospital reconstructive volumes were extracted. Cox regression models of time from colectomy to reconstruction were performed, including age, sex, calendar time of colectomy, time from diagnosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis and pelvic pouch volume in the models. The patients were divided into groups depending on the annual number of pelvic pouches performed at the hospital performing the colectomy: 0, 1-3, 4-7, >7.

resultsColectomy was performed in 4112 patients, 1932 (47%) patients were reconstructed. Restorative surgery was more common in high-volume versus low-volume units (62% vs. 38%). Ileorectal anastomosis was slightly more common than pelvic pouch (964 (50%) vs. 927 (48%)), but in high-volume units only 30% of the reconstructed patients received an ileorectal anastomosis. The chance of pelvic pouch increased with each volume category (HR: 1; 1.49; 1.79; 2.22 (p < 0.001)).

conclusionThe likelihood of receiving pouch surgery depends on the hospital where the colectomy was performed, which must be considered in the future organization of UC-surgery.

Indexed as

ColectomyColitis, UlcerativeColonic PouchesHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeProctocolectomy, RestorativeAdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesSwedencolectomypelvic pouchreconstructive surgeryulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID40958388
PMCPMC12441475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.