ReviewTransplantation2026
Unique Immune Polarization of the Lung Allograft: Implications for Organ-specific Immunoregulation and Tolerance Induction.
Review in Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics characterises early immune divergence associated with infection-related deterioration after lung transplantation.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- B cell-mediated immune reconstitution after lung transplantation: mechanisms, interventions, and prognostic evaluation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Regulatory T cell therapy in solid organ transplantation: mechanisms, translational progress, and remaining barriers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Technological innovations have improved many barriers in lung transplantation, but high rates of acute and chronic rejection still limit lung allograft survival. This may be explained by the unique environment of the lung. As a mucosal barrier organ, the lung is constantly exposed to the external environment, leading to unique immunological features that are not seen in other transplantable solid organ allografts such as hearts, kidneys, and livers. Thus, the higher rates of rejection and poor long-term survival of lung transplant recipients may stem from the global immunosuppression strategies that are indiscriminately used for all solid organ grafts. Data from our laboratory, and others, have demonstrated that the unique immunoregulatory pathways of the lung may require different strategies for long-term graft survival. For example, depletion of CD8 + T cells typically contributes to the acceptance of transplanted organs. However, these cells facilitate lung allograft acceptance through interferon gamma mediated nitric oxide production. Interestingly CD8 + T cells modify and polarize eosinophils to produce nitric oxide as a means of tolerance induction. Such eosinophils also function to maintain long-term lung allograft acceptance by interfering with humoral alloimmunity. For most other organs eosinophils are suspected to contribute to graft rejection. In this review, we aim to describe the cytokine pathways involved in lung allograft rejection or tolerance, contrast such pathways to those evident in other solid organs, and discuss the need for further studies that can be used to design rational methods for altering the cytokine environment to improve lung allograft survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.