Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40958134›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Comparison of standard circular stapler anastomosis with or without circumferential suture enhancement in patients with robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy due to malignant tumours of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction-a multi-centre, randomised, superiority study (STITCHES).

Janik Hinkelmann, Helena Reitberger, Bruno Bancke Laverde, Andreas R R Weiß, Maximilian Brunner, Robert Grützmann, Georg F Weber, Christian Krautz

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janik HinkelmannDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, Erlangen, Germany.
Helena ReitbergerDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, Erlangen, Germany.
Bruno Bancke LaverdeDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1989-5064
Andreas R R WeißDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1257-5517
Maximilian BrunnerDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9615-321X
Robert GrützmannDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2559-0476
Georg F WeberDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1175-4505
Christian KrautzDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, Erlangen, Germany. Christian.Krautz@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2537-5824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMorbidity due to anastomotic leakage is a major concern in transthoracic oesophagectomy. The aim of this randomised trial is to evaluate whether a circumferential suture reinforcement of the stapled end-to-side anastomosis in robot-assisted minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy (RAMIE) leads to a reduced incidence of anastomotic leakages in the postoperative course. METHODS/

designThis is a multi-centre randomised, double-blind, superiority trial with an adaptive sample size design undergoing RAMIE for malignant tumours. Patients will be randomised 1:1 into two study arms. In study arm A, participants will receive a standard circular-stapled end-to-side oesophagogastric anastomosis, while in study arm B, the anastomosis will have a circumferential suture reinforcement. The primary endpoint is the rate of anastomotic leakage. Secondary endpoints are incision-to-suture time, duration of circumferential suture reinforcement, anastomotic stenosis rate, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and quality of life. DISCUSSION: This randomised controlled trial will assess the impact of circumferential suture reinforcement of the oesophagogastric anastomosis on short-term outcomes and quality of life of patients undergoing robot-assisted minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy. TRIAL REGSITRATION: DRKS00034787. Registered on 7 October 2024.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyEsophagogastric JunctionRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgical StaplingSuture TechniquesAnastomosis, SurgicalDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAnastomotic leakOesophageal cancerOesophagectomyOesophagogastric anastomosisRAMIESuture reinforcement

Identifiers

PMID40958134
PMCPMC12439365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.