ArticleBMC public health2025
Personal perceptions of risky drinking and alcohol guidelines - a qualitative analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Motives for Reducing Alcohol Consumption Among Users of an Alcohol Reduction App: Content Analysis.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRisky drinking is prevalent in European countries despite health authorities issuing guidelines created to support individuals to make informed choices about their alcohol intake. The current study explored personal perceptions of risky drinking, perceptions of the personal relevance of guidelines, and the processes used to form perceptions.
methodThree hundred and eight participants from Sweden and the UK completed an online survey containing open-ended questions about perceptions of risky drinking and personal relevance of drinking guidelines. Data was analysed using Thematic analysis embedded within a Framework analysis comparing answers from Sweden and UK.
resultsPersonal perceptions of risky drinking were formed primarily using experiential and affective judgments, and related to concerns over developing problems with alcohol, losing control, drinking as a coping mechanism, and causing harm to oneself or others. Guidelines were interpreted using experiential judgements, resulting in affective responses, expressed as negative attitudes towards the guidelines in terms of scepticism and denial. Those acknowledging the risk expressed ambivalence, in terms of a struggle for change.
conclusionsPerceptions of risky drinking extend beyond the physical act of consuming alcohol and encompass various contextual factors, affective states, effects of alcohol on the individual, and its impact on social roles and relationships. Risk guidance may not be interpreted as intended, with many who exceed the recommendations do not perceive their behaviour as risky. Understanding perceptions of risk can help support changes in behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.