Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40958093›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2025

Immune-mediated indirect interaction between gut microbiota and bacterial pathogens.

Maryam Keshavarz, Mathias Franz, Haicheng Xie, Caroline Zanchi, Susan Mbedi, Sarah Sparmann, Jens Rolff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maryam KeshavarzEvolutionary Biology, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. mariakshvrz@gmail.com.
Mathias FranzEvolutionary Biology, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Haicheng XieEvolutionary Biology, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Caroline ZanchiEvolutionary Biology, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Susan MbediBerlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research, BeGenDiv, Berlin, Germany.
Sarah SparmannBerlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research, BeGenDiv, Berlin, Germany.
Jens RolffEvolutionary Biology, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FOR 5026-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KE 3013/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn many animals, survival during infection depends on the ability to coordinate interactions between the host immune system and gut microbiota. These tripartite interactions, in turn, potentially shape pathogen virulence evolution. A key regulator of the immune system and, hence, bipartite interactions in insects is the immune deficiency (Imd) pathway, which modulates gut microbiota and pathogens by synthesizing antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) through the NF-κB transcription factor Relish. However, whether Imd-dependent AMPs mediate indirect interactions between gut microbiota and pathogens in a tripartite context remains unclear. Using RNAi-mediated knockdown of Tenebrio molitor Relish (TmRelish), we hypothesized that Imd-dependent AMPs influence indirect interaction between Providencia burhodogranariea_B (P. b_B) infection and the gut microbiota.

resultsTmRelish knockdown altered bipartite interactions by disrupting gut microbiota load and composition, increasing pathogen load, and ultimately leading to higher host mortality during infection. However, we did not find support for our tripartite hypothesis that Imd-dependent AMPs mediate indirect interactions between the gut microbiota and P. b_B infection, suggesting the involvement of alternative regulatory pathways or Imd-independent mechanisms. Nevertheless, our investigations of tripartite interactions showed a positive effect of P. b_B infection on gut microbiota load, which in turn stimulated the expression of a subset of AMPs. However, this upregulation of AMPs did not result in reduced P. b_B load. Notably, the gut microbiota did not affect pathogen load but promoted host survival during P. b_B infection, indicating a role in increasing host tolerance rather than resistance.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that while Imd-dependent AMPs may not mediate tripartite interactions in our system, microbiota-host interactions, such as microbiota-mediated immune priming and changes in microbiota load, can shape infection outcomes. These effects on infection outcomes almost certainly exert important selective pressures on the evolution of bacterial virulence.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHost-Pathogen InteractionsTenebrioAnimalsAntimicrobial PeptidesAntimicrobial PeptidesGut microbiotaHost–pathogen-microbiota interactionsImd-dependent antimicrobial peptidesRelishTenebrio molitor

Identifiers

PMID40958093
PMCPMC12442303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.