Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2026
Ultrasound-guided comparison of needle decompression sites in obese patients: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal site for needle decompression in tension pneumothorax patients with a body mass index (BMI) over 30 remains debated. This study aimed to identify the most suitable site-second intercostal space at the midclavicular line (2nd ICS in the MCL) or fifth intercostal space at the midaxillary line (5th ICS in the MAL)-by comparing skin-to-pleura distances using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Skin-to-pleura distance measurements at the right 2nd ICS-MCL and the right 5th ICS in the MAL, assessed by three different operators. The primary outcome was to compare the skin-to-pleura distances at the 2nd ICS in the MCL and the 5th ICS in the MAL using POCUS in volunteers with a BMI over 30. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the consistency of different operators in determining the most appropriate site for needle decompression in the management of tension pneumothorax among healthy volunteers with a BMI over 30, using bedside ultrasonography. A total of ninety-one volunteers were enrolled. The skin-to-pleura distance at the 5th ICS in the MAL was found to be statistically significantly greater than that at the 2nd ICS in the MCL in the measurements performed by each operator (Operator 1: p = 0.016; Operator 2: p = 0.002; Operator 3: p = 0.006). The MCL measurements obtained by all three operators demonstrated statistically significant agreement. In obese patients, the 2nd ICS-MCL may be considered the preferred site for needle decompression. Nevertheless, individualized assessment of both sites using bedside ultrasonography is recommended to optimize procedural success and reduce complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40958006What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.