ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Machine learning in sex estimation using CBCT morphometric measurements of canines.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital odontometric analysis for sex estimation in Egyptian adolescents.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluating the accuracy of sex estimation from human tooth volume: leveraging automated AI segmentation and comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess measurements of the maxillary canines using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and develop a machine learning model for sex estimation. MATERIALS AND
methodsCBCT scans from 610 patients were screened. The maxillary canines were examined to measure total tooth length, average enamel thickness, and mesiodistal width. Various supervised machine learning algorithms were employed to construct predictive models, including Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Logistic Regression, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest Classifier, Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost. Validation of each model was performed using a 10-fold cross-validation approach. Metrics such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 Score were computed, with ROC curves generated for visualization.
resultsThe total length of the tooth proved to be the variable with the highest predictive power. The algorithms that demonstrated superior performance in terms of AUC were LightGBM and Logistic Regression, achieving AUC values of 0.77 [CI95% = 0.65-0.89] and 0.75 [CI95% = 0.62-0.86] for the test data, and 0.74 [CI95% = 0.70-0.80] and 0.75 [CI95% = 0.70-0.79] in cross-validation, respectively. Both models also showed high precision values.
conclusionsThe use of maxillary canine measurements, combined with supervised machine learning techniques, has proven to be viable for sex estimation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The machine learning approach combined with is a low-cost option as it relies solely on a single anatomical structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40957974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.