Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40957926›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2025

Vasectomy in real-world clinical practice: an ideal checklist to improve patient experience and outcomes.

Jacob O Rust, Thairo A Pereira, Helen L Bernie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Vasectomy revisited: Safe procedure in a changing reproductive landscape.International journal of impotence research · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacob O RustDepartment of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2849-8137
Thairo A PereiraDepartment of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0864-2898
Helen L BernieDepartment of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. hbernie@iuhealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3665-6074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vasectomy is a highly effective method of permanent contraception for men, offering a minimally invasive and cost-efficient alternative to female sterilization. Over 500,000 vasectomies are performed annually in the U.S., making it the most common non-diagnostic procedure conducted by urologists. Despite this, many residents may not gain adequate training in performing vasectomies in residency, and there are several specific patient populations that warrant additional counseling and care in their approach to a vasectomy. This paper provides a comprehensive review and checklist for the physician detailing necessary steps in the evaluation, counseling, treatment, and management of patients seeking a vasectomy. This includes a focus on special patient scenarios like the young, childless male, the expecting couple, or the individual with intellectual disabilities. Additionally, we review surgical techniques, postoperative care, and reimbursement to ensure a structured, effective approach to vasectomy, while addressing potential challenges that may arise with the goal of optimizing the patient experience and outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID40957926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.