ArticleScientific reports2025
Organic photovoltaic prediction model based on Bayesian optimization and explainable AI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiscale Numerical Modelling and Structural Design of Bulk Heterojunction Nanocomposites for Organic Photovoltaics: From Molecular Interfaces to Device Optimization.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Enabled Real-Time Prediction of Drying Shrinkage in Fly Ash-Modified Cementitious Materials.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Machine Learning in Non-fullerene Organic Solar Cells: Accelerating Discovery, Design, and Understanding.ACS omega · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the decades, as industrialization progressed, energy has been a critical topic for scientists and engineers. Particularly, photovoltaic technology has drawn great attention in the renewable energy industry as an environmentally clean technology for converting sunlight into electricity. However, the complexity of energy chemistry and the need for novel materials to improve solar cell efficiency and cost-effectiveness have led to challenges in establishing rules beyond empirical observations. Machine learning models are being developed to streamline the prediction process and efficiently predict photovoltaic parameters. This paper proposes a novel hybrid-optimized multi-objective predictive model to predict the photovoltaic parameters: open-circuit voltage (Voc), current density (Jsc), fill factor (FF), and power conversion efficiency (PCE). The proposed model is based on Bayesian Optimization (BO) with the ensemble Bootstrap Aggregating (Bagging) decision tree. The proposed model integrates with the Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) using the SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) values to introduce feature importance analysis that provides valuable insights into the impact of individual features on prediction outputs. The proposed model, named BO-Bagging, achieves high prediction accuracy, with an average high correlation coefficient of r = 0.92, a coefficient of determination of R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.