ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on the main controlling factors of low permeability coal seam under the action of high-pressure water jetting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The difficulty of underground gas extraction in coal mines depends on the permeability of the coal body, and coal body permeability enhancement is one of the keys to gas extraction research. To improve the permeability of low-permeability coal seams, artificial measures to increase the cracking of coal seams are an effective means to improve the permeability of coal seams. By analyzing the principle of high-pressure water jet seam making, experimental research on the influencing factors of jet flat drag seam making was carried out with a true triaxial test device, and the influencing laws of jet angle, number of drilling holes, jet pressure, ground stress, and seam strength on the seam making effect were analyzed, and on-site applications were carried out. The test results show that the high-pressure water jet can form evenly distributed 'tooth-like' cracks on both sides of the slit hole, and with the increase of the jet angle and the increase of the strength of the coal seam, as well as the increase of the ground stress, the length of the cracks is gradually reduced; On the contrary, the crack length becomes progressively longer as the jet pressure increases.Field test results show that the optimal cutting pressure is 80 MPa, when the cutting time is 12 min, the corresponding depth of cutting is about 1.75 m, at this time, the reasonable optimal cutting hole spacing is 6 m, the optimal cutting slot spacing is 4 m. The experimental results can provide a reference for similar coal mine gas extraction and hydrometallisation measures for gas management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.