Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40957865›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2025

Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in vertebral surgery: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Alessandro De Cassai, Maria Bisi, Marco Nardelli, Irene Paiusco, Serafino Talarico, Valentina Fincati, Burhan Dost, Annalisa Boscolo, Paolo Navalesi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Erector spinae plane block.BJA education · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alessandro De CassaiDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-1832
Maria BisiDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7971-0448
Marco NardelliDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3296-9705
Irene PaiuscoDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1956-7605
Serafino TalaricoDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2505-285X
Valentina FincatiDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5164-5383
Burhan DostDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, School of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-1172
Annalisa BoscoloDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3409-4159
Paolo NavalesiDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3733-3453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has gained attention as a regional anesthesia technique for pain management in vertebral surgeries. This umbrella review synthesizes data from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of the ESP block in reducing postoperative opioid consumption, pain, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing vertebral surgeries. Methods: A search was conducted in CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed Central, and Scopus from 2016 to 2025. The authors included SRs and meta-analyses that investigated the use of the ESP block in vertebral surgeries. Primary outcomes were opioid consumption at 24 postoperative hours (measured as milligrams of morphine equivalent), pain scores at 12 and 24 hours, PONV incidence, and the need for additional analgesics. Quality was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Results: Thirteen SRs were included. The ESP block reduced opioid consumption at 24 postoperative hours (mean morphine equivalents difference, -8.70 to -18.69), although high heterogeneity was observed. Pain reduction at 12 and 24 hours was statistically significant but clinically modest, with most SRs reporting reductions of less than one point in Numeric Rating Scale or Visual Analog Scale pain scales. The ESP block also significantly reduced PONV and additional analgesic use. However, most SRs were rated as low quality due to inadequate pre-registration and justification for excluding studies. Conclusions: The ESP block demonstrates potential as a multimodal analgesia component in vertebral surgeries, reducing opioid consumption, pain intensity, and PONV. However, high heterogeneity and low methodological quality highlight the need for further research.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, ConductionErector Spinae PlaneMeta-AnalysisNerve BlockPain, PostoperativeSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID40957865
PMCPMC12485463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.