Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40957661›Full record

ArticleGut2025

Gut microbiome comparability between DNA extraction kits.

Gregory R Young, Nurulamin Noor, Aryan Khirwadkar, Lauren C Beck, Mohmmed Tauseef Sharip, Kevin Whelan, Nicholas A Kennedy, Jack Satsangi, Julian Marchesi, Luke Jostins-Dean and 5 more

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gregory R YoungTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK greg.young@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5342-1421
Nurulamin NoorDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Aryan KhirwadkarTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3500-0193
Lauren C BeckTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Mohmmed Tauseef SharipDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6385-6971
Kevin WhelanNutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5414-2950
Nicholas A KennedyGastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Jack SatsangiNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Julian MarchesiDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Luke Jostins-DeanKennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Christopher StewartTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6033-338X
Paul A LyonsDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Miles ParkesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Christopher Andrew LambTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7271-4956
IBD-RESPONSE collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CROHN'S DISEASEGASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOMEINFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASEMICROBIOMEULCERATIVE COLITIS

Identifiers

PMID40957661
PMCPMC7619175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.