ArticleJMIR dermatology2025
Use of a Large Language Model as a Dermatology Case Narrator: Exploring the Dynamics of a Chatbot as an Educational Tool in Dermatology.
Article in JMIR dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- AI Tool Use Among Osteopathic Medical Students: Pilot Digital Diary Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- The AI Colleague: Reimagining Interprofessional Collaboration and Education in Medicine.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: An International Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Dermatology "AI Babylon": Cross-Language Evaluation of AI-Crafted Dermatology Descriptions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- From Prompts to Practice: Evaluating ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok Against Plastic Surgeons in Local Flap Decision-Making.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: A comparison of dermatological cases generated by artificial intelligence (AI) versus those created without AI by medical students revealed that AI-created cases were characterized by detailed case descriptions, analysis of medical history, and clinical examinations, but lacked the depth, clinical relevance, and motivational elements found in non-AI cases, which were shorter, presented clinical dilemmas, and included challenging scenarios that students found more educational and engaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.