ReviewJMIR dermatology2025
Acral Persistent Papular Mucinosis in the United States: Case Series and Literature Review.
Review in JMIR dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acral persistent papular mucinosis (APPM) is a localized variant of lichen myxedematosus (LM) characterized by asymptomatic, flesh-colored papules primarily distributed on the hands and forearms. This chronic dermatosis, distinct from generalized mucinosis due to its lack of systemic involvement, remains underreported in medical literature. Objective: In this study, we present two cases of APPM to the limited pool of documented cases in the United States, highlighting its emerging recognition. Methods: This is a case series of two patients presenting with asymptomatic papular eruptions on the hands and wrists, consistent with the typical presentation of APPM. Diagnostic confirmation via biopsy revealed focal cutaneous mucinosis. Comprehensive laboratory evaluations, including serum and urine protein electrophoresis, showed no evidence of underlying gammopathy in either patient. Results: Treatment modalities for APPM are limited and often ineffective. Unlike other forms of LM, APPM features are confined to skin lesions, posing primarily as a cosmetic concern with a favorable prognosis. Accurate diagnosis of this localized LM is crucial to differentiate it from the more severe, generalized form, scleromyxedema, which can have organ involvement and may become fatal. Notably, while spontaneous resolution is reported in LM, including discrete papular mucinosis, APPM typically persists without resolution even after extended follow-up. Conclusions: These cases underscore the importance of recognizing APPM and advocating for broader awareness and exploration of its clinical variability, etiology, and management strategies. With increasing recognition, the understanding of APPM can be enhanced, paving the way for optimized management and improved outcomes for affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.