Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40957008›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Public Perspectives on Palliative and Hospice Care: Social Media Content Analysis Using Topic Modeling and Multiclass Sentiment Analysis.

Aeri Kim, Kyungmi Woo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aeri KimThe Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6993-060X
Kyungmi WooCollege of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8710-2696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative care enhances dignity and quality of life for patients with serious illnesses by managing distressing symptoms and supporting families. However, inadequate awareness and misconceptions often hinder patients and their families from accessing these services. Understanding of public perspectives on palliative and hospice care can facilitate the development of targeted educational resources and awareness campaigns. As social media becomes an important source of health information, analyzing such publicly available web-based sources can yield valuable insights into perceptions of palliative and hospice care.

objectiveThis study analyzed public perspectives posted on a popular social media platform in South Korea to understand perceptions, challenges, needs, and sentiments related to palliative and hospice care.

methodsData were collected from Naver Knowledge iN, a popular web-based public forum in South Korea, encompassing 34,501 texts posted between 2002 and 2024. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 9072 relevant perspectives were analyzed. Contextualized topic modeling was used to identify themes, and the optimal model was selected based on coherence, diversity scores, and expert feedback. In addition, multiclass sentiment analysis using a fine-tuned Korean bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (KoBERT) model classified sentiments into 6 categories. The multiclass sentiment model's performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F

resultsSocial media discussions on palliative and hospice care have increased steadily over time. Topic modeling identified 9 themes, with "ethical and legal concerns" and "medical care in hospitals" peaking in recent years, suggesting growing public interest in these areas. "Emotional and psychological support" emerged as the predominant theme, reflecting a significant need for psychosocial assistance among patients and their families. Sentiment analysis revealed that "sadness," "anxiety," and "neutral" were common emotions across many topics. Notably, themes such as "emotional and psychological support," "disease treatment outcomes and prognosis," "medical care in hospitals," "financial issues," and "symptom management" were predominantly associated with "sadness," while "administrative and volunteer services," "ethical and legal concerns," and "nutrition management" were more closely linked with "anxiety."

conclusionsThis study highlights public concerns about palliative and hospice care in South Korea, including ethical dilemmas, caregiving burden, and emotional distress. Findings underscore the need for communication strategies that address informational, emotional, and psychological needs. Culturally sensitive, interactive communication tools, such as artificial intelligence-powered chatbots and public education campaigns, may help dispel misconceptions and promote timely, informed decisions about palliative and hospice care.

Indexed as

Hospice CarePalliative CarePublic OpinionSocial MediaHumansRepublic of Koreahospicenatural language processingNaverpalliative caresentiment analysissocial mediatopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID40957008
PMCPMC12485256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.