Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40956986›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2025

Development of a Data-Based Method for Predicting Nursing Workload in an Acute Care Hospital: Methodological Study.

Mark McMahon, Sylvie Plate, Tobias Herz, Gabi Brenner, Michael Kleinknecht-Dolf, Michael Krauthammer

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark McMahonDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zürich, Schmelzbergstrasse 26, Zürich, 8006, Switzerland, 41 446356631.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6675-7887
Sylvie PlateDirectorate of Nursing and Allied Health Care Professionals, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7519-4906
Tobias HerzDirectorate of Nursing and Allied Health Care Professionals, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2990-9324
Gabi BrennerDirectorate of Nursing and Allied Health Care Professionals, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2524-2508
Michael Kleinknecht-DolfDirectorate of Nursing and Allied Health Care Professionals, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4652-7743
Michael KrauthammerDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zürich, Schmelzbergstrasse 26, Zürich, 8006, Switzerland, 41 446356631.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4808-1845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Determining effective nurse staffing levels is crucial for ensuring quality patient care and operational efficiency within hospitals. Traditional workload prediction methods often rely on professional judgment or simple volume-based approaches, which can be inaccurate. Machine learning offers a promising avenue for more data-driven and precise predictions, by using historical nursing workload data to forecast future patient care requirements, which could help with staff planning while also improving patient outcomes and nurse well-being. Objective: This methodological study aimed to use nursing activity data, specifically LEP (Leistungserfassung in der Pflege; "documentation of nursing activities"), to predict the future workload requirements using machine learning techniques. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study at the University Hospital of Zürich, using nursing workload data for inpatients across eight wards, collected between 2017 and 2021. Data were transformed to represent nursing workload per ward and shift, with 3 shifts per day. Variables used in modeling included historical workload trends, patient characteristics, and upcoming operations. Machine learning models, including linear regression variants and tree-based methods (Random Forest and XGBoost), were trained and tested on this dataset to predict workload 72 hours in advance, on a shift-by-shift basis. Model performance was assessed using mean absolute error and mean absolute percentage error, and results were compared against a baseline of assuming no change in workload from the time of prediction. Prediction accuracy was further evaluated by categorizing future workload changes into decreased, similar, or increased workload relative to current shift levels. Results: Our findings demonstrate that machine learning models consistently outperform the baseline across all wards. The best-performing model was the lasso regression model, which achieved an average improvement in accuracy of 25.0% compared to the baseline. When used to predict upcoming changes in workload levels, the model achieved strong classification performance, giving an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 and precision values between 66.2% and 75.3%. Crucially, the model severely misclassified-predicting an upcoming increase as a decrease, and vice versa-in just 0.17% of cases, highlighting potential reliability for using the model in practice. Key variables identified as important for predictions include historical shift workload averages and overall ward workload trends. Conclusions: This study suggests the potential of machine learning to enhance nurse workload prediction, while highlighting the need for refinement. Limitations due to potential discrepancies between recorded nursing activities and the actual workload highlight the need for further investigation into data quality. To maximize impact, future research should focus on: (1) using more diverse data, (2) more advanced machine learning architecture that performs time-series modeling, (3) addressing data quality concerns, and (4) conducting controlled trials for real-world evaluation.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNursing Staff, HospitalWorkloadFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesacute caredataforecastinghospitallinear modelsmachine learningnursenursing staffnursing workloadobservationalpredictionpredictiveretrospectivestaffstatistical modelingworkload

Identifiers

PMID40956986
PMCPMC12440230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.