Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40956929›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Learning Reimagined: AI's Role in Advancing Education of Cancer Research and Treatment Technology.

Maria F Chan, Dongxu Wang

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria F ChanDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9140-8604
Dongxu WangDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual learning, through graphics, diagrams, and other visual tools, has been shown to significantly enhance information retention, with studies indicating that up to 83% of learning is visual. In the field of radiation oncology, where continuous education is critical to the safe and effective treatment of cancer, the complexity and text-heavy nature of traditional resources can pose barriers to effective learning. This editorial examines the transformative potential of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in supporting cancer care professionals by enhancing comprehension of radiation oncology documents through tailored, visual learning modules. Using the AAPM TG-100 report "Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management" as a proof of concept, the authors first developed web-based infographics manually and then demonstrated how AI tools such as ChatGPT, ClickUp, and NotebookLM dramatically expedite the process. These tools not only automate the creation of high-quality visuals but also support personalized and multimodal learning, including AI-generated podcasts for auditory learners. By making complex oncology-specific content more accessible, AI empowers radiation oncology clinicians and trainees to better understand, implement, and innovate in cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasmsRadiation OncologyHumansLearningAAPM TG reportsartificial intelligenceinfographic learningmedical physics educationradiation oncology education

Identifiers

PMID40956929
PMCPMC12441274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.