Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
βInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
Article
4 · The record
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Michał A Michałowski *Department of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław 50-368, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0158-9959
Katarzyna Terejko *Department of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław 50-368, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0805-4444
Michalina GosDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław 50-368, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9147-1251
Ilona IżykowskaDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław 50-368, Poland.
Marta M CzyżewskaDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław 50-368, Poland.
Karol KłopotowskiDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław 50-368, Poland.
Przemysław T KaczorDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław 50-368, Poland.
Aleksandra BrzóstowiczDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław 50-368, Poland.
Estera PłużekDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław 50-368, Poland.
Monika MigdałekDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław 50-368, Poland.
Jerzy W MozrzymasDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław 50-368, Poland.
Funding
National Science Center (Poland) 2015/18/A/NZ1/00395
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Φ value analysis underscores strong functional and structural compactness of the GABA · full record | OpenQuestion