Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40956887›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

A universal wind-wave-bubble formulation for air-sea gas exchange and its impact on oxygen fluxes.

Luc Deike, Xiaohui Zhou, Paridhi Rustogi, Rachel H R Stanley, Brandon G Reichl, Seth M Bushinsky, Laure Resplandy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luc DeikeDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-4644-9909
Xiaohui ZhouHigh Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-0405-3252
Paridhi RustogiDepartment of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-3354-6718
Rachel H R StanleyDepartment of Chemistry, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481.ORCID 0000-0003-4860-2476
Brandon G ReichlNOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ 08540.
Seth M BushinskyDepartment of Oceanography, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawai'i at Mãnoa, Honolulu, HI 96822.ORCID 0000-0001-5106-4678
Laure ResplandyHigh Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-1212-3943

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2122042National Science Foundation (NSF) 2318816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bubble-mediated gas exchange associated with wave breaking is a critical pathway for ocean-atmosphere exchange of low solubility gases such as oxygen. Yet, ocean and climate models, as well as observation-based products, usually rely on wind-only air-sea flux formulations derived from carbon constraints that ignore the asymmetric nature of the bubble flux, contributing to discrepancies between estimates of oxygen inventories and their response to climate change. Without bubbles, gas exchange is controlled by a symmetric wind-driven exchange, with the ocean-atmosphere gas partial pressure difference controlling whether outgassing or uptake occurs. Bubbles entrained by wave breaking can enhance this symmetric turbulent exchange, and contribute an additional asymmetric flux, always leading to an uptake, as they get squeezed by hydrostatic pressure (large bubbles) or collapse and fully dissolve (small bubbles). We present an observation-constrained theoretical framework of the air-sea flux accounting for air entrainment due to wave breaking and symmetric and asymmetric bubble exchange. The combined evidence from theory, laboratory, and field measurements of carbon dioxide fluxes, oxygen concentration, and noble gas supersaturation yields a universal formulation of gas exchange which we implement into a global ocean biogeochemical model. We discuss the resulting oxygen fluxes and demonstrate that our wind-wave-bubble formulation better reproduces observed in situ oxygen concentrations in water mass formation regions, where air-sea exchange is high, than a commonly used wind-only formulation. We show that the asymmetric bubble flux is essential for evaluating air-sea oxygen fluxes and estimating the magnitude of the ocean oxygen loss associated with global warming.

Indexed as

air–sea gas exchangebubblesoxygensupersaturationwave breaking

Identifiers

PMID40956887
PMCPMC12478149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.