Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40956841›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Classifying simulated gait impairments using privacy-preserving explainable artificial intelligence and mobile phone videos.

Lauhitya Reddy, Ketan Anand, Shoibolina Kaushik, Corey Rodrigo, J Lucas McKay, Trisha M Kesar, Hyeokhyen Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauhitya ReddyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0621-8130
Ketan AnandDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3308-0949
Shoibolina KaushikDepartment of Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-3836
Corey RodrigoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
J Lucas McKayDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Trisha M KesarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Hyeokhyen KwonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5693-3278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of gait impairments is often hindered by subjective or costly assessment methods, with current solutions relying on either expensive multi-camera equipment or subjective clinical observation. There is a critical need for accessible, objective tools that can aid in gait assessment while preserving patient privacy. In this work, we present a mobile phone-based, privacy-preserving artificial intelligence (AI) system for classifying gait impairments that leverages a novel dataset of 743 videos capturing seven distinct gait types. The dataset consists of frontal and sagittal views of clinicians simulating normal gait and six types of pathological gait (circumduction, Trendelenburg, antalgic, crouch, Parkinsonian, and vaulting), recorded using standard mobile phone cameras. Our system achieved 86.5% accuracy using combined frontal and sagittal views, with sagittal views generally outperforming frontal views except for specific gait types like circumduction. Model feature importance analysis revealed that frequency-domain features and entropy measures were critical for classification performance. Specifically, lower limb keypoints proved most important for classification, aligning with clinical understanding of gait assessment. These findings demonstrate that mobile phone-based systems can effectively classify diverse gait types while preserving privacy through on-device processing. The high accuracy achieved using simulated gait data suggests their potential for rapid prototyping of gait analysis systems, though clinical validation with patient data remains necessary. This work represents a significant step toward accessible, objective gait assessment tools for clinical, community, and tele-rehabilitation settings.

Identifiers

PMID40956841
PMCPMC12440163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.