ArticlePloS one2025
Pronated foot and reactive balance: A preliminary comparative study of older women.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simulated hearing loss in healthy young and older adults results in poor reaction time in older adults.Pacific journal of health (Stockton, Calif.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults with pronated foot may face greater challenges in maintaining balance, which increases their risk of falling. Reactive balance, which refers to the ability to restore stability following an unforeseen disturbance, is a key component in evaluating fall-related postural control. Evaluating reactive balance can provide insights about balance capabilities and potential fall risks in this population.
objectiveThis study compared the reactive balance (center of mass displacement and reaction time) between older women with and without pronated foot.
methodsThirty-two older women comprising 16 with bilateral pronated foot and 16 without pronated foot participated in the study. To assess reactive balance, a three-dimensional motion analysis was conducted. Each participant was equipped with 29 retroreflective markers and compensatory stepping corrections were performed in the forward direction. Independent t-test was used to compare the center of mass displacement and reaction time between the two groups.
resultsThe older women with pronated foot exhibited significantly slower reaction times than those without pronated foot (p = 0.017). However, no significant difference was determined for the center of mass displacement between the two groups (p = 0.367).
conclusionThis study indicated that older women with pronated foot had significantly prolonged reaction times, suggesting an impairment in reactive response. However, the lack of significant differences in the center of mass displacement between those with and without pronated foot suggest that although older women with pronated foot maintain balance similar to those without pronated foot, their delayed reaction times may hinder the ability to make quick, involuntary stepping adjustments, potentially increasing fall risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.