ArticlePloS one2025
Challenges and perceptions of dental undergraduate students regarding active learning in clinical practice: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the challenges faced by dental students during clinical practice and to understand their perceptions of how active learning methodologies contribute to fostering critical and reflective participation in problem-solving throughout the teaching-learning process.
methodsThis qualitative study applied the action research method in a descriptive and interpretive manner, implementing active learning methodologies in the adolescent clinic of the Federal University of Uberlândia (Brazil). This clinic is among the fundamental elements in the Public Health System. This research included 33 students in the final term of the dentistry course (10th term), divided into three groups of 9-13 students each, and regularly enrolled in clinic practice. The data was collected in three 90-minute workshops with each group. This study used Minayo's methodological framework and the arc method by Spanish educator Charles Maguerez to conduct the action research. This research comprised five steps: 1. Clinical experience; 2. Identification of challenges; 3. Theorization of challenges based on scientific evidence; 4. Development of action strategies; 5. Application of strategies in clinical practice. The theoretical framework was Paulo Freire's problematization methodology. Data analysis followed the thematic content analysis technique.
resultsAfter comprehensive data analysis, the main challenges concerned the work process, productivity, and infrastructure. The formulated strategies included the establishment of a procedures table, implementation of minimum age regulations for companions in the waiting area, adjustment of clinic hours, enhancement of auxiliary professional training, and maintenance of dental equipment.
conclusionThe groups' experience with active methods qualified them to identify and address relevant practice challenges. It allowed study participants to lead their teaching-learning process and develop action strategies to transform the work process. Reflecting on implementing these strategies in clinical practice transformed the students' reality and promoted more dynamic and meaningful learning. However, solving challenges, such as infrastructure, requires a continuous commitment of financial resources and institutional support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.