ArticlePloS one2025
Exploring the impact of visual function degradation on manual prehension movements in normal-sighted individuals.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Impairments of visual function abilities, such as visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, can negatively impact our ability to perform manual prehension tasks. Despite the clear link between visual input and motor output, there is still limited understanding of how visual function deficits affect hand motor behavior. This study aimed to explore the impact of different levels of visual function degradation, specifically in terms of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, on the reach and grasp components of manual prehension. To this end, visual function degradation was induced in young participants with normal vision using five different densities of Bangerter occlusion foils. Participants were instructed to perform a natural and accurate reach-to-grasp task towards a cylindrical object with two different diameters (3.5 or 7 cm) and positioned at two distances (25 or 50 cm). The effects of visual function degradation, object size, and distance were evaluated by recording the position and trajectory of the right hand using an optoelectronic motion capture system. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis revealed that visual function degradation in normal-sighted individuals directly altered the reach and grasp components of prehension movements. These alterations included longer movement durations, lower velocity and acceleration profiles, slower deceleration phases, over-scaled hand grip apertures, and greater trajectory deviations. The effects were dependent on the level of visual degradation induced and the intrinsic (size) and extrinsic (distance) object properties. Reductions exceeding 70% in visual acuity and 55% in CS had the most pronounced impact on prehension components. However, subtle reductions greater than 30% in visual acuity and 15% in contrast sensitivity were sufficient to trigger compensatory mechanisms. These findings provide further understanding of how visual function degradation affects prehension movement strategies, highlighting the crucial relationship between visual feedback quality and object properties in the motor online control of the transport, manipulation and spatial components. Our results offer new insights into the implications of visual impairments on manual prehension movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.