Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40956796›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Enhanced gallbladder cancer detection via active and self-supervised learning integration: Innovating B-ultrasound image analysis.

Jia Li, Yu-Qian Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jia LiCollege of Applied Mathematics, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yu-Qian ZhouCollege of Applied Mathematics, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0009-0000-4565-6693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallbladder cancer, a common yet often under diagnosed malignancy, is typically characterized by late detection and a poor prognosis. The rise of deep learning has introduced new methods for its early identification through B-ultrasound imaging, but there are still challenges of inefficient data labeling and feature extraction. This paper introduces a novel classification algorithm, ASGBC, intended to tackle related challenges in diagnosing gallbladder cancer using B-ultrasound images. Firstly, we combine active learning with self-supervised learning to decrease the reliance on labeled data. Secondly, we introduce the MsHop module, which effectively captures the fine textures and patterns in ultrasound images through the integration of multi-scale and high-order information, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, we develop a dual-branch loss function that leverages data correlation and clustering features to enhance feature extraction and model stability. The experiments on a gallbladder ultrasound dataset have confirmed the effectiveness of our algorithm, achieving an accuracy of 0.884, a specificity of 0.932, and a sensitivity of 0.912-outperforming existing methods. The results exhibit lower variance, indicating improved model stability. Furthermore, the findings demonstrate that using active learning, one can achieve comparable results to those from the full dataset with only 35% of the data, reducing annotation costs and increasing model learning efficiency. Further research will concentrate on refining the algorithm for wider clinical use and identifying additional features that may further improve diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Gallbladder NeoplasmsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsDeep LearningGallbladderHumansUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40956796
PMCPMC12440165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.