Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40956790›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

Basal forebrain cholinergic input mediates adaptive attention allocation to enhance olfactory discrimination.

Rahul Garg, Qiang Qiu, C Ron Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rahul GargGraduate School of Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
Qiang QiuStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
C Ron YuGraduate School of Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0009-8367-8848

Funding

Circuit architecture and dynamics representation in odor perceptionR01DC014701 · NIDCD · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI Thomas A Cleland, Yingxi Lin · 2015 to 2026
$6.4M
Genetic Mapping of Functional Vomeronasal CircuitsR01DC008003 · NIDCD · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI YU, CONGRONG RON · 2006 to 2020
$5.7M
Mechanisms of Developmental Plasticity in the Mammalian Olfactory SystemR01DC016696 · NIDCD · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI Congrong Ron Yu · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008003NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014701NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By selectively amplifying relevant sensory input, animals efficiently allocate limited cognitive resources to improve decision-making. Allocation of attention is aligned with behavioral goals and adaptive to cognitive demand, but the circuit mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we identify an attention circuit for odor processing where cholinergic neurons in the horizontal nucleus of the diagonal band provide top-down control through inhibitory dopaminergic short-axon cells in the mouse olfactory bulb. Attentional cue triggered cholinergic activity provides preparatory disinhibition of olfactory sensory axons to enhance response to reward-associated odors and improves decision-making. Preparatory, but not reward-dependent, cholinergic activity is disengaged in proficient animals when the task becomes routine, underlying a trade-off between proficiency and attention engagement. Direct manipulation of the disinhibitory circuit reinstates attentional effect without eliciting general arousal. A computational model of the circuit recapitulates the dynamic change in attention responses and illustrates a two-stage adaptation that efficiently allocates cognitive resources.

Indexed as

AttentionBasal ForebrainCholinergic NeuronsOlfactory PerceptionSmellAnimalsCuesDecision MakingDopaminergic NeuronsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOdorantsOlfactory BulbReward

Identifiers

PMID40956790
PMCPMC12440206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.