Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40956524›Full record

ArticleGenes & genomics2025

Identification of microbiome markers for ordered groups.

Jaehong Yu, Md Mozaffar Hosain, Taesung Park

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jaehong Yu *Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Md Mozaffar Hosain *Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Taesung ParkInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. tspark@stats.snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8294-590X

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022R1A2C1092497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying microbiome markers associated with ordered phenotypes, such as disease stages or severity levels, is crucial for understanding disease progression and advancing precision medicine. Despite this importance, most existing methods for differential abundance analysis are designed for binary group comparisons and do not incorporate ordinal information, limiting their ability to capture trends across ordered categories.

objectiveTo develop and evaluate statistical methods that explicitly account for ordinal phenotype structure in microbiome data, addressing challenges such as sparsity and zero inflation, and improving the detection of meaningful microbial associations.

methodsIn this study, we propose and evaluate three novel approaches specifically tailored for microbiome association analysis with ordered groups: the binary optimal test, the linear trend test, and the proportional odds model-based permutation test (POMp). These methods explicitly account for the ordinal structure of phenotypes and address the sparsity and zero-inflation commonly observed in microbiome data through permutation-based inference. We applied the proposed methods to three publicly available gut microbiome datasets, including two related to obesity and one concerning colorectal cancer.

resultsAll three proposed methods successfully identified differentially abundant features (DAFs) that exhibited stronger ordinal associations compared to those identified by existing methods. In particular, POMp consistently outperformed other approaches in terms of correlation with phenotype order, demonstrating its potential to identify biologically relevant markers.

conclusionThe findings of this study highlight the importance of incorporating ordinal information in microbiome studies and provide robust statistical tools for advancing microbial biomarker discovery in complex disease contexts.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaBiomarkersColorectal NeoplasmsHumansObesityPhenotypeBiomarkersAssociation analysisDifferential abundanceOrdinal phenotypePermutation testProportional odds model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.