Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40956493›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2025

Effects of Temporary Ambiguity on Preschoolers' Comprehension of Mandarin Relative Clauses.

Jiawei Shi, Jing Li, Peng Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiawei Shi *Department of Linguistics, School of International Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7463-1700
Jing Li *Department of Linguistics, School of International Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Peng ZhouDepartment of Linguistics, School of International Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China. zhoupeng1892@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-2545

Funding

Major Humanities and Social Sciences Research Projects in Zhejiang higher education institutions 2024QN087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been reported that children's comprehension of complex structures is affected by temporary ambiguity. Yet, much less is known about its effect on children's comprehension of relative clauses (RCs). To fill this gap, the present study focused on Mandarin RCs, where temporary ambiguity often plays a role in the comprehension of object-extracted RCs. More specifically, we directly manipulated the (non)existence of temporary ambiguity in object-extracted RCs and compared 3- to 5-year-olds' understanding of object-extracted and subject-extracted RCs. Using the Truth Value Judgment Task, we found a clear developmental trajectory of preschoolers' abilities to comprehend the RCs. The 3-year-olds could correctly understand the object-extracted RCs only when there was no temporary ambiguity in the sentence, while the 4- and 5-year-olds exhibited successful comprehension regardless of the (non)existence of temporary ambiguity. In addition, when temporary ambiguity was not present, object-extracted RCs were generally easier than subject-extracted RCs for preschoolers to comprehend. Taken together, the findings inform us about the role of temporary ambiguity in RC comprehension, and point to the necessity of taking into account this factor when examining children's sentence comprehension performance.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentComprehensionLanguageLanguage DevelopmentPsycholinguisticsChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMandarin chinesePreschoolersRelative clausesTemporary ambiguity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.