ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Middle meningeal artery embolization in patients treated with Japanese Kampo Goreisan for recurrent chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective cohort comparative study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and Radiographic Course Following Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adjuvant middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) after burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has emerged as a promising strategy. However, in Japan, MMAE is not covered by national health insurance; thus, it has been reserved for patients with recurrent CSDHs after burr-hole drainage. Goreisan has been reported to lower the incidence of recurrent CSDHs. Hence, we investigated the synergistic effect of MMAE and Goreisan in patients with recurrent CSDH. We prospectively included patients with recurrent CSDHs who received Goreisan after burr-hole drainage and separated them into groups based on whether MMAE was performed (group B + G + MMAE) or not (group B + G). Out of 605 patients who underwent burr-hole drainage for CSDHs, groups B + G and B + G + MMAE comprised 20 and 34 consecutive patients, respectively. Patient characteristics, such as age, sex, antithrombotic medications, history of blood coagulopathy disorders, and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores before symptom onset, did not differ between the two groups. No significant differences in the incidence of re-recurrent CSDHs (5% and 5.8%, in groups B + G and B + G + MMAE, p > 0.05, respectively) and favorable functional outcome (mRS score ≤ 2) at 3-month retreatment (90% and 76.5% in groups B + G and B + G + MMAE, p > 0.05, respectively) were found in the two groups 3 months post-retreatment. A positive effect of MMAE in preventing the re-recurrence of CSDHs in patients treated with Goreisan for recurrent CSDHs was not observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40956457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.