Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40956368›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2025

Mosquito-based transmission-blocking vaccine candidates for malaria: progress, challenges, and innovations.

Nisha Dahiya, Mahima Yadav, Divya Kataria, Sangeeta Janjoter, Neelam Sehrawat

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nisha Dahiya *Department of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India.
Mahima Yadav *Department of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India.
Divya KatariaDepartment of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India.
Sangeeta JanjoterDepartment of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India.
Neelam SehrawatDepartment of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India. neelamsehrawat@mdurohtak.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last two decades, a significant reduction has been seen in malaria-attributable morbidity and mortality but still, it remains a major public health burden in many countries. The outbreak of malaria due to climate change in some countries emphasizes the critical need for improved strategies to treat, prevent, and control malaria. Although WHO has recommended RTS, S/AS01, and R-21/Matrix-M (R21), these vaccines have shown lesser efficacy. The low efficacy of the vaccines emphasizes the need for discovering a promising vaccine. Present vaccines are parasite-based and can only reduce the severity of the disease and risk of death. Transmission-blocking vaccines (TBVs) can prevent the risk of the spread of infectious malaria disease worldwide. Several studies revealed that mosquito-based TBVs can effectively target a wide variety of parasites, and significantly reduce the survival rate of the vector. In the present review, various mosquito-based studies involving antisera-raising methods for evaluating transmission-blocking efficacy are included. This review focuses on the efforts made to justify a specific protein as a TBV candidate, the status of mosquito-based TBV antigens, challenges in developing potential mosquito-based TBV, and promising approaches for improving the transmission-blocking efficacy of the TBVs. This review gives an insight into the benefits of using mosquito-based TBVs as a transmission-blocking strategy for malaria.

Indexed as

CulicidaeMalariaMalaria VaccinesMosquito VectorsAnimalsAnophelesHumansMalaria VaccinesMalaria controlMembrane feeding assayMosquito-based TBVsPlasmodiumRaising antiseraTransmission-blocking efficacy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.