ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2026
Additional treatment for esophageal cancer patients with incomplete resection due to the surrounding organ invasion: a nationwide survey of 45 Japanese centers.
Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe occasionally experience incomplete resection of esophageal cancer due to the surrounding organ invasion. The efficacy of additional treatment in these cases is unknown.
methodsWe studied 445 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were unable to undergo curative esophagectomy due to cancer invasion to the surrounding organs at 45 esophageal centers in Japan. Survival outcomes were compared based on the additional treatment modalities.
resultsPostoperatively, 175 (40.0%) received no additional treatment, while 59 (13.5%), 153 (35.0%), and 50 (11.4%) received additional chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or radiotherapy, respectively. The three-year disease progression and overall survival rates were 90.6% (95% confidence interval 87.2-93.1%) and 15.4% (95% confidence interval 12.2-19.3%), respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and radiotherapy were all independently associated with reduced disease progression (hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 0.57 [0.40-0.81], 0.52 [0.39-0.69], and 0.48 [0.33-0.72], respectively). Meanwhile, additional treatment with chemotherapeutic agents (chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy) was independently associated with better overall survival (hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 0.51 [0.35-0.73] and 0.59 [0.44-0.79], respectively); however, radiotherapy alone had a limited impact (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.74 [0.50-1.10]).
conclusionsAny additional treatment could suppress disease progression after incomplete resection, but radiotherapy alone has a limited effect. Additional systemic chemotherapeutics may increase patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40956363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.