ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Laser speckle contrast imaging for real-time quantification of colonic perfusion following high versus low tie in anterior rectal resection surgery: a pilot prospective study.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal anastomotic safety assessment using ICG fluorescence and flexible endoscopy (COLOSSEUM): a global survey of 1367 surgeons.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Does the level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation affect outcomes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Does the level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation affect outcomes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Feasibility of laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) in colorectal surgery: a prospective comparison with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Beyond fluorescence intensity: a Minimum acquisition and reporting standard and emerging technologies for colorectal indocyanine green fluorescence angiography studies.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal management of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in rectal cancer surgery remains controversial owing to its unclear impact on bowel perfusion. This study aimed to objectively evaluate perfusion differences between high tie (HT) and low tie (LT) using laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) and determine its value in guiding surgical decisions.
methodsPatients who underwent laparoscopic anterior rectal resection for rectal or rectosigmoid cancer were prospectively enrolled for either HT or LT. The primary outcome was the maximum perfusion distance (MPD). The secondary outcomes included the Speckle Flow Index (SFI) at the transection site and the frequency of LSCI-guided surgical revisions.
resultsAfter propensity score matching ( n = 30/group), no significant overall difference was found in the median MPD ( P = 0.12) or mean SFI ( P = 0.20) between the HT and LT groups. However, a key finding was the identification of a high-risk HT patient subgroup with critically short MPD, a phenotype that was absent in the LT cohort. Consequently, LSCI guidance prompted surgical revision in 16.7% of the HT patients (vs. 0% in the LT group). Ultimately, this individualized approach resulted in an equally low anastomotic leakage rate (3.3%) in both the cohorts.
conclusionOur results from this pilot study are hypothesis-generating. While the average perfusion did not differ significantly between IMA management techniques, HT posed a unique risk by creating a patient subset with critically compromised perfusion. Real-time LSCI assessment proved effective in identifying these high-risk individuals intraoperatively, prompting timely surgical revisions and thereby reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.