ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2025
Pan-ERBB Inhibitors Synergize With KRAS Inhibitors in Rectal Cancer.
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Daraxonrasib and the era of pan-RAS inhibition: mechanisms, clinical advances, and resistance landscapes.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Targeting PRMT5 Inhibitor-Induced Adaptation in Pancreatic Cancer with the RBM39 Degrader Indisulam.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Targeting metabolic dependencies to reverse chemoradiotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Article
- Pan-ERBB Inhibitors Synergize With KRAS Inhibitors in Rectal Cancer.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Article
- Unlocking RAS: Finding the Right Combination Is the Key.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmerging RAS inhibitors show promise in treating KRAS-mutated malignancies, but resistance mechanisms limit their clinical efficacy. Given recent clinical findings associating KRAS mutations with reduced response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer (RC), we aimed to investigate their impact on treatment outcomes and explore potential therapeutic strategies.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 390 rectal cancer patients to evaluate the association of KRAS mutations with disease-free survival (DFS) and response to therapy. We assessed the efficacy of KRAS inhibitors in rectal cancer cell lines, patient-derived organoids (PDOs), and patient-derived cell lines (PDCLs), and explored adaptive resistance mechanisms through transcriptomic profiling and unbiased drug screening experiments.
resultsMutant KRAS was associated with a reduced DFS and RCs harboring G12C and G12V mutations had less complete pathological responses to neo-adjuvant therapies. KRAS-mutated RC cells demonstrated adaptive resistance to KRAS inhibitors, characterized by transcriptomic restoration of oncogenic pathways, including MYC and E2F, and upregulation of ERBB2/3 expression. Consistently, drug screening identified EGFR family inhibitors as potent combinatorial partners, effectively overcoming KRAS inhibitor tolerance by inducing apoptosis. In patient-derived models, the pan-RAS inhibitor RMC-6236 combined with EGFR inhibitors demonstrated significant synergistic effects and prevented long-term tumor cell outgrowth.
conclusionOur findings point to the negative impact of KRAS mutations, particularly G12C and G12V, on RC treatment outcomes. Adaptive resistance by upregulation of ERBB genes limits the efficacy of KRAS inhibitors. Combining these with pan-ERBB inhibitors enhances anti-tumor effects in patient-derived cellular RC models, showing its potential as an alternative to the combination with anti-EGFR antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.