ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
RETRACTED: Polygenic risk score and prostate specific antigen predict death from prostate cancer in men with intermediate aggressive cancer.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) and the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test have been shown to be successful tools for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) incidence. In this study, we assessed the potential of combining PRS and PSA as biomarkers for PCa aggressiveness and subsequent mortality from patients with low to intermediate risk PCa from the TAPG-TURP cohort. Targeted sequencing of 140 PCa-related genes was performed using 162 prostate samples from PCa patients with a Gleason score of 6 or 7, 80 of whom died from the disease. An additional 305 genome samples from healthy participants of the 1000 Genomes Project phase 3 were selected as controls. Two novel PRSs were developed using 21 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) selected from those differentiated between alive (n = 82) and dead (n = 80) PCa patients. The first PRS was used in decision tree-based models, such as random forest (rf) able to accurately distinguish cancer from healthy samples (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 100%, AUC = 1). The second PRS was used together with Gleason score and PSA in an artificial neural network model able to determine the aggressiveness of PCa by predicting PCa mortality with intermediate to high accuracy (sensitivity = 90%, specificity = 68.8%, AUC = 0.718). Further work must be done using our two machine learning classifiers to validate them further and apply them in the clinic, bypassing the necessity of invasive and more expensive approaches. Their application will potentially guide the clinical decision-making process and reduce costs of the clinical management of PCa patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.