ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
Developing a Co-Produced Practice Framework to Support Personalised Safety Planning for Adults Experiencing Suicidality.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing a Co-Produced Practice Framework to Support Personalised Safety Planning for Adults Experiencing Suicidality.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSuicide safety plans are widely used internationally in health and social care settings. This study aimed to co-produce a framework for supporting personalised safety planning, sensitive to the needs, preferences and values of people experiencing suicidality.
methodsPhase 1 conducted semi-structured interviews to explore the views and preferences of adults with lived experience of suicidality on the content and implementation of personalised suicide safety planning. In Phase 2, interactive practitioner workshops reviewed and refined a draft framework for personalised suicide safety planning. Data analysis was conducted in two steps: an inductive thematic analysis of interview data, followed by a deductive-inductive approach to develop the themes using data from two workshops with practitioners.
resultsn = 11 adults with current or previous lived experience of suicidality participated in semi-structured interviews, and n = 16 practitioners from primary care, secondary care, third sector and emergency services involved in providing suicide prevention were recruited to two workshops. Two overarching themes and six sub-themes were identified: (1) the personalisation of safety planning (sub-themes-co-production, involving family and friends, true personalisation) and (2) the process of safety planning (sub-themes-implementation, format and purpose) were used to inform the structure of a prototype personalised suicide safety planning framework.
conclusionsPersonalised suicide safety planning requires early intervention and a person-centred approach. Pivotal to this is the need to move away from standardised tools towards the development of a workforce with the skills and confidence to work flexibly and collaboratively with the people they are supporting. Future research is needed to test the utility of the framework in a range of settings, including primary care, urgent care and the third sector. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was co-produced from the outset by people with personal experience of suicidality. Pre-study public engagement helped inform the study design, and peer researchers on the study team collaborated in all stages of the process from design through to dissemination, including development of this manuscript. PPI involvement was included in practitioner workshops and in producing accessible dissemination materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.